Difference between revisions of "Wish list"

From Liberty Eiffel Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(attributes are ok to me)
 
m (Removed items that were done already, even if this list is obsolete.)
 
(45 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Community]]
+
[[Category:Obsolete]]
  +
This whish list is obsolete, please use the ticket system for [https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=additem&group=liberty-eiffel bugs] and [https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?func=additem&group=liberty-eiffel tasks] on [https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/liberty-eiffel/ savannah].
If you have a request to '''improve SmartEiffel''', to improve the SmartEiffelWiki,
 
to ask for a '''new page''' in the Grand SmartEiffel Book or, to propose a modification of
 
the Eiffel language of SmartEiffel, please, update this page yourself.
 
Do not forget to sign thanks to the <TT>~~</TT><TT>~~</TT> special command which gives:<BR>
 
[[User:Colnet|Colnet]] 19:19, 21 Jun 2005 (MET DST).
 
 
==Exception handling==
 
My highest priority request is to improve exception handling. If an exception is caught by a "rescue" clause but remains active because there is no "retry", then the stack dump should still be printed on program termination. --[[User:Eiffel|Roger Browne]] 12:54, 13 Jul 2005 (CEST)
 
 
Yes. I don't know how the runtime behaves in that case. Meanwhile, I think a workaround is to call [[library_class:ANY|<tt>ANY</tt>]]<tt>.print_run_time_stack</tt> in your '''rescue''' clause. --[[User:Cadrian|Cyril]] 15:00, 13 Jul 2005 (CEST)
 
 
Unfortunately this doesn't work,
 
[http://wwsympa.loria.fr/wwsympa/arc/smarteiffel/2001-03/msg00105.html as]
 
[http://wwsympa.loria.fr/wwsympa/arc/smarteiffel/2003-09/msg00000.html has]
 
[http://wwsympa.loria.fr/wwsympa/arc/smarteiffel/2003-09/msg00002.html been]
 
[http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smalleiffel/message/1438 discussed]
 
[http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smalleiffel/message/1441 many]
 
[http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smalleiffel/message/1439 many]
 
[http://wwsympa.loria.fr/wwsympa/arc/smarteiffel/2001-03/msg00106.html times].
 
It only prints the unwound stack.
 
--[[User:Eiffel|Roger Browne]] 17:33, 18 Jul 2005 (CEST)
 
 
Well, forgive my poor forgetting mind... I thought all was solved in this area now since [http://smartzilla.loria.fr/show_bug.cgi?id=469 sz:469] is fixed.
 
--[[User:Cadrian|Cyril]] 10:10, 28 Jul 2005 (CEST)
 
   
 
==COMMAND_LINE_TOOLS==
 
==COMMAND_LINE_TOOLS==
  +
I don't think this is worth a task, as [[eiffeldoc]] already is an example for [[tool_class:EXTERNAL_TOOL|<tt>EXTERNAL_TOOL</tt>]].
I would very much like some documentation and/or tutorial example on how to write a new
 
  +
--[[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]])
EXTERNAL_TOOL using COMMAND_LINE_TOOLS. The underlying acyclic visitor pattern
 
has been explainhed a couple of times on the ML and I am also aware of
 
http://smartzilla.loria.fr/attachment.cgi?id=180&action=view but what I miss is
 
some more basic information, e.g. what exactly does the tree of visitable objects
 
look like and how does it relate to the system being parsed? With such documentation, people
 
would be able to write plugins for non-Eiffel specic IDEs, class browserts and the like.
 
--Frank
 
 
The best (most up-to-date) tutorial currently available is [[eiffeldoc]], which is an [[tool_class:EXTERNAL_TOOL|<tt>EXTERNAL_TOOL</tt>]] and extensively uses [[library_class:VISITOR|Visitors]]. Of course more information will be added in this wiki. It will be available [[tools|there]].
 
--[[User:Cadrian|Cyril]] 00:25, 18 Jul 2005 (CEST)
 
 
==German translator wanted==
 
I am looking for german native speakers ready to follow the translation in german
 
of the Grand Book.
 
--[[User:Colnet|Colnet]] 17:33, 15 Jul 2005 (CEST)
 
 
It would be great to also have a Spanish translation. And all the other languages are welcome too. --[[User:Cadrian|Cyril]] 00:25, 18 Jul 2005 (CEST)
 
 
==Spanish translator wanted==
 
I'm not a person with a lot of extra time, but could work in the spanish translation. What must be done to start a new language section?
 
--[[User:Dmoisset|Dmoisset]] 01:07, 30 Jul 2005 (CEST)
 
 
Same thing for me & German: Have little time, but could help.--[[User:Coertel|Coertel]] 08:21, 2 Aug 2005 (CEST)
 
 
The Spanish and German languages have been created. Fell free to start feeding them.
 
--[[User:Cadrian|Cyril]] 09:45, 6 Aug 2005 (CEST)
 
   
 
==Class TREE==
 
==Class TREE==
  +
Is it worth a ticket? -> I don't think so. it's too unspecific what TREE should be good for.
I would like to have a '''Class TREE''' be added to the library.
 
--[[User:Colonna]] 12:53, 24 Sep 2005 (CEST)
+
--[[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]])
   
 
==Incremental Eiffel compilation==
 
==Incremental Eiffel compilation==
  +
On C level the code is "incrementally" compiled ;-) But no, there will not be a redesign in near future. So we should better drop this request.
Incremental compilation of the Eiffel sources, not only of the generated C code.
 
  +
--[[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]])
--Anonymous
 
 
What for? Do you mind the compiler is too slow?
 
--[[User:Colnet|Colnet]] 03:13, 21 Oct 2005 (CEST)
 
 
==New keyword "attribute"?==
 
What's your opinion about the integration of "attribute" into SmartEiffel? Of course there would be
 
no new functionality at all, but for documentations it would be very nice :-).
 
--Interested SmartEiffel user
 
   
  +
== Finally implementing SCOOP? ==
My opinion is that the "attribute" idea is a good idea. If other members of the team
 
  +
==> [[task:13317]]
are ok too, this will be added one day in the SmartEiffel language.
 
--[[User:Colnet|Colnet]] 12:12, 10 Nov 2005 (CET)
 
   
  +
== Make generated C code thread-safe? ==
I don't mind. Indeed it's a nice documenting tool. Especially for contracts. --[[User:Cadrian|Cyril]] 08:50, 12 Nov 2005 (CET)
 
  +
==> [[task:13320]]

Latest revision as of 08:58, 8 July 2024

This whish list is obsolete, please use the ticket system for bugs and tasks on savannah. 

COMMAND_LINE_TOOLS

I don't think this is worth a task, as eiffeldoc already is an example for EXTERNAL_TOOL. --Ramack (talk)

Class TREE

Is it worth a ticket? -> I don't think so. it's too unspecific what TREE should be good for. --Ramack (talk)

Incremental Eiffel compilation

On C level the code is "incrementally" compiled ;-) But no, there will not be a redesign in near future. So we should better drop this request. --Ramack (talk)

Finally implementing SCOOP?

==> task:13317

Make generated C code thread-safe?

==> task:13320