Difference between revisions of "Wish list"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hzwakenberg (talk | contribs) m |
Hzwakenberg (talk | contribs) m (Removed items that were done already, even if this list is obsolete.) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
On C level the code is "incrementally" compiled ;-) But no, there will not be a redesign in near future. So we should better drop this request. |
On C level the code is "incrementally" compiled ;-) But no, there will not be a redesign in near future. So we should better drop this request. |
||
--[[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]]) |
--[[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]]) |
||
| − | |||
| − | ==New keyword "attribute"?== |
||
| − | ==> [[task:13319]] / '''DONE''' |
||
== Finally implementing SCOOP? == |
== Finally implementing SCOOP? == |
||
| Line 22: | Line 19: | ||
== Make generated C code thread-safe? == |
== Make generated C code thread-safe? == |
||
==> [[task:13320]] |
==> [[task:13320]] |
||
| − | |||
| − | == TUPLE argument in feature 'call' of class PROCEDURE == |
||
| − | ==> [[task:13318]] / '''DONE''' |
||
Latest revision as of 08:58, 8 July 2024
This whish list is obsolete, please use the ticket system for bugs and tasks on savannah.
COMMAND_LINE_TOOLS
I don't think this is worth a task, as eiffeldoc already is an example for EXTERNAL_TOOL. --Ramack (talk)
Class TREE
Is it worth a ticket? -> I don't think so. it's too unspecific what TREE should be good for. --Ramack (talk)
Incremental Eiffel compilation
On C level the code is "incrementally" compiled ;-) But no, there will not be a redesign in near future. So we should better drop this request. --Ramack (talk)
Finally implementing SCOOP?
==> task:13317
Make generated C code thread-safe?
==> task:13320