Difference between revisions of "Wish list"

From Liberty Eiffel Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (typo)
m (Removed items that were done already, even if this list is obsolete.)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Category:Obsolete]]
 
[[Category:Obsolete]]
 
This whish list is obsolete, please use the ticket system for [https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=additem&group=liberty-eiffel bugs] and [https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?func=additem&group=liberty-eiffel tasks] on [https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/liberty-eiffel/ savannah].
 
This whish list is obsolete, please use the ticket system for [https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=additem&group=liberty-eiffel bugs] and [https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?func=additem&group=liberty-eiffel tasks] on [https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/liberty-eiffel/ savannah].
 
==Exception handling==
 
==> [[task:13316]]
 
   
 
==COMMAND_LINE_TOOLS==
 
==COMMAND_LINE_TOOLS==
Line 16: Line 13:
 
On C level the code is "incrementally" compiled ;-) But no, there will not be a redesign in near future. So we should better drop this request.
 
On C level the code is "incrementally" compiled ;-) But no, there will not be a redesign in near future. So we should better drop this request.
 
--[[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]])
 
--[[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]])
 
==New keyword "attribute"?==
 
==> [[task:13319]]
 
   
 
== Finally implementing SCOOP? ==
 
== Finally implementing SCOOP? ==
 
==> [[task:13317]]
 
==> [[task:13317]]
   
=== Make generated C code thread-safe? ===
+
== Make generated C code thread-safe? ==
 
==> [[task:13320]]
 
==> [[task:13320]]
 
== TUPLE argument in feature 'call' of class PROCEDURE ==
 
==> [[task:13318]]
 

Latest revision as of 08:58, 8 July 2024

This whish list is obsolete, please use the ticket system for bugs and tasks on savannah. 

COMMAND_LINE_TOOLS

I don't think this is worth a task, as eiffeldoc already is an example for EXTERNAL_TOOL. --Ramack (talk)

Class TREE

Is it worth a ticket? -> I don't think so. it's too unspecific what TREE should be good for. --Ramack (talk)

Incremental Eiffel compilation

On C level the code is "incrementally" compiled ;-) But no, there will not be a redesign in near future. So we should better drop this request. --Ramack (talk)

Finally implementing SCOOP?

==> task:13317

Make generated C code thread-safe?

==> task:13320