Difference between revisions of "Wish list"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(move wishes into tasks) |
Hzwakenberg (talk | contribs) m (Removed items that were done already, even if this list is obsolete.) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Category: |
+ | [[Category:Obsolete]] |
| + | This whish list is obsolete, please use the ticket system for [https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=additem&group=liberty-eiffel bugs] and [https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?func=additem&group=liberty-eiffel tasks] on [https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/liberty-eiffel/ savannah]. |
||
| − | |||
| − | ==Exception handling== |
||
| − | ==> [[task:13316]] |
||
==COMMAND_LINE_TOOLS== |
==COMMAND_LINE_TOOLS== |
||
I don't think this is worth a task, as [[eiffeldoc]] already is an example for [[tool_class:EXTERNAL_TOOL|<tt>EXTERNAL_TOOL</tt>]]. |
I don't think this is worth a task, as [[eiffeldoc]] already is an example for [[tool_class:EXTERNAL_TOOL|<tt>EXTERNAL_TOOL</tt>]]. |
||
| − | [[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]]) |
+ | --[[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]]) |
==Class TREE== |
==Class TREE== |
||
Is it worth a ticket? -> I don't think so. it's too unspecific what TREE should be good for. |
Is it worth a ticket? -> I don't think so. it's too unspecific what TREE should be good for. |
||
| − | [[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]]) |
+ | --[[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]]) |
==Incremental Eiffel compilation== |
==Incremental Eiffel compilation== |
||
On C level the code is "incrementally" compiled ;-) But no, there will not be a redesign in near future. So we should better drop this request. |
On C level the code is "incrementally" compiled ;-) But no, there will not be a redesign in near future. So we should better drop this request. |
||
| − | [[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]]) |
+ | --[[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]]) |
| − | |||
| − | ==New keyword "attribute"?== |
||
| − | ==> [[task:13319]] |
||
== Finally implementing SCOOP? == |
== Finally implementing SCOOP? == |
||
==> [[task:13317]] |
==> [[task:13317]] |
||
| − | + | == Make generated C code thread-safe? == |
|
==> [[task:13320]] |
==> [[task:13320]] |
||
| − | |||
| − | == TUPLE argument in feature 'call' of class PROCEDURE == |
||
| − | ==> [[task:13318]] |
||
Latest revision as of 08:58, 8 July 2024
This whish list is obsolete, please use the ticket system for bugs and tasks on savannah.
COMMAND_LINE_TOOLS
I don't think this is worth a task, as eiffeldoc already is an example for EXTERNAL_TOOL. --Ramack (talk)
Class TREE
Is it worth a ticket? -> I don't think so. it's too unspecific what TREE should be good for. --Ramack (talk)
Incremental Eiffel compilation
On C level the code is "incrementally" compiled ;-) But no, there will not be a redesign in near future. So we should better drop this request. --Ramack (talk)
Finally implementing SCOOP?
==> task:13317
Make generated C code thread-safe?
==> task:13320