Difference between revisions of "Wish list"

From Liberty Eiffel Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(move wishes into tasks)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Community]]
+
[[Category:Obsolete]]
  +
This whish list is obsoloete, please use the ticket system for [https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=additem&group=liberty-eiffel bugs] and [https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?func=additem&group=liberty-eiffel tasks] on [https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/liberty-eiffel/ savannah].
   
 
==Exception handling==
 
==Exception handling==
Line 6: Line 7:
 
==COMMAND_LINE_TOOLS==
 
==COMMAND_LINE_TOOLS==
 
I don't think this is worth a task, as [[eiffeldoc]] already is an example for [[tool_class:EXTERNAL_TOOL|<tt>EXTERNAL_TOOL</tt>]].
 
I don't think this is worth a task, as [[eiffeldoc]] already is an example for [[tool_class:EXTERNAL_TOOL|<tt>EXTERNAL_TOOL</tt>]].
[[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]])
+
--[[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]])
   
 
==Class TREE==
 
==Class TREE==
 
Is it worth a ticket? -> I don't think so. it's too unspecific what TREE should be good for.
 
Is it worth a ticket? -> I don't think so. it's too unspecific what TREE should be good for.
[[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]])
+
--[[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]])
   
 
==Incremental Eiffel compilation==
 
==Incremental Eiffel compilation==
 
On C level the code is "incrementally" compiled ;-) But no, there will not be a redesign in near future. So we should better drop this request.
 
On C level the code is "incrementally" compiled ;-) But no, there will not be a redesign in near future. So we should better drop this request.
[[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]])
+
--[[User:Ramack|Ramack]] ([[User talk:Ramack|talk]])
   
 
==New keyword "attribute"?==
 
==New keyword "attribute"?==

Revision as of 21:06, 10 September 2014

This whish list is obsoloete, please use the ticket system for bugs and tasks on savannah. 

Exception handling

==> task:13316

COMMAND_LINE_TOOLS

I don't think this is worth a task, as eiffeldoc already is an example for EXTERNAL_TOOL. --Ramack (talk)

Class TREE

Is it worth a ticket? -> I don't think so. it's too unspecific what TREE should be good for. --Ramack (talk)

Incremental Eiffel compilation

On C level the code is "incrementally" compiled ;-) But no, there will not be a redesign in near future. So we should better drop this request. --Ramack (talk)

New keyword "attribute"?

==> task:13319

Finally implementing SCOOP?

==> task:13317

Make generated C code thread-safe?

==> task:13320

TUPLE argument in feature 'call' of class PROCEDURE

==> task:13318