Search results

[[#AssignmentTest|<tt>?:=</tt>]] assignment test operator, the [[#ForcedAssignment|<tt>::=</tt>]] forced assignment statement as well as the

<TT>Void</TT> can also be used on the right side of the assignment sign to voluntarily lose assignment sign when the left side is of an expanded type is not allowed.

*[[Syntax diagrams#Assignment|<tt>:=</tt> (syntax)]] *[[Syntax diagrams#Assignment|Assignment (syntax)]]

For such a polymorphic assignment to be legal, <tt>A</tt> must be a subtype of <tt>B</tt> which ===Rule 1 (Assignment)===

[[#Assignment|Assignment]], the left-hand-side of the <TT>:=</TT> assignment operator.

* Removed the danger of automatic boxing (object allocation on assignment of expanded types to reference entities)

...e value of the expression on the right side. In case of the "Hello World!" assignment a new object of type STRING is created on the heap, initialized to the text

...e of <tt>y</tt> or else the static type of <tt>y</tt> is acceptable for an assignment to the static type of <tt>x</tt>.

Without going into [[Assignment|all the details of assignments]], the effect of those two instructions in r Note that the same can happen during the assignment of an <tt>expanded</tt> type variable.

For example, an expression can be used on the right-hand side of an assignment.

*** no tests for type conformity (ditto; cf the forced assignment operator <TT>::=</TT>)

Covariance is defined in terms of conformance. But assignment is That's exactly, and only, what our paper defines: assignment

...with a human readable comment like <code>/*l133c5/string.e*/</code>). The assignment modifies the status of the current dump stack frame (see [[#The managed sta

...me/no_check.c</TT>. The macro <TT>set_dump_stack_top</TT> accomplishes the assignment of its argument in this variable.