Difference between revisions of "External types"
m (36 revisions: initial import from SamrtEiffel Wiki - The Grand SmartEiffel Book) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 22:04, 3 March 2013
The syntax will have to be flexible enough to work for any reasonable external language, not just C (e.g. Java). No provision is made for embedding variable-sized external types.
The plug-in for the examples
For syntactic experiments, we'll assume the following C files are used.
my_struct.h:
typedef struct { double x; int c; } my_struct;
my_struct.c:
#include "my_struct.h" use (my_struct *x) { x->x = 3.14; if(x->c == 0) x->c = 5; else x->c++; printf("x = %f, c = %d\n", x->x, x->c); } use_copy (my_struct x) { x.x = 3.14; if(x.c == 0) x.c = 5; else x.c++; printf("x = %f, c = %d\n", x.x, x.c); }
The program should print
x = 3.14, c = 5 x = 3.14, c = 6
Embedding external types in SmartEiffel
There are currently two competing mechanisms. Their expressivity is roughly the same (when you have one it is easy to emulate the other).
External attributes
The "external" keyword is used as a type name to tell the Eiffel compiler that an attribute should be represented by a user-specified external type. (The precise syntax is not fixed: the attribute may look better with a "plug_in" manifest string or an "is" keyword)
class SHOW creation make feature make is do use($ext) use_copy(ext) end use (x: POINTER) is external "plug_in" alias "{ location: "./" module_name: "struct" feature_name: "use" }" end use_copy (x: like ext) is external "plug_in" alias "{ location: "./" module_name: "struct" feature_name: "use_copy" }" end ext: external alias "{ location: "./" module_name: "struct" attribute_type: "my_struct" }" end end
External classes
A special marker is used to tell the Eiffel compile that a class should be represented by a user-specified external type. Methods of that class can be implemented by passing Current as a parameter to external routines. Whether Current is passed by copy or by reference could be determined by the reference/expanded status of the external class.
Issues:
- Forces the programmer to write one class for each external type they want to wrap
expanded class SHOW external "plug_in" alias "{ location: "./" module_name: "struct" attribute_type: "my_struct" }" creation make feature make is do -- Memory is zeroed, so we probably don't need to initialize x and -- c. If we do, we'll have to call a C function to do it. use($Current) use_copy(Current) end use (x: POINTER) is external "plug_in" alias "{ location: "./" module_name: "struct" feature_name: "use" }" end use_copy (x: like Current) is external "plug_in" alias "{ location: "./" module_name: "struct" feature_name: "use_copy" }" end end
Two variants (along with possible hybrids)
Living at the edge of the Eiffel world
- External classes always insert exactly ANY (and don't inherit from anything)
- they can't be inherited from (and probably not inserted either)
- they can't have ordinary Eiffel attributes.
Ordinary Eiffel citizens
- External classes can have Eiffel attributes
- External classes can be inherited from and inserted
- External classes ca, inherit from or insert other classes
Likely to result in a very unclean implementation (need either to reorder the struct so that the external part is at the beginning, or to represent references to such objects as pointers 'into' the object (rather than to its head), or to mess with the pointer when passing it to the C world). Even more mess likely in case of multiple external parents.
Inline external classes
Ok, so there are actually three mechanisms, but this one is hybrid between the previous two (give the external attribute an Eiffel type that doesn't need to be defined anywhere else)
With this approach we can even allow this type for external features, which would solve the pass-by-value/reference question: do a copy or use a pointer to it.
Issues:
- What is the scope of such a type? Only visible in the class it is written in? Are two external types with the same "name" in different classes the same?
class SHOW creation make feature make is do use($ext) copy_use(ext) end use (x: POINTER) is external "plug_in" alias "{ location: "./" module_name: "struct" feature_name: "use" }" end use_copy (x: like ext) is -- Here a copy of x would be passed external "plug_in" alias "{ location: "./" module_name: "struct" feature_name: "use_copy" }" end ext: external MY_STRUCT is -- inline declaration of external type external "plug_in" alias "{ location: "./" module_name: "struct" attribute_type: "my_struct" }" end end
Helper functions
It must be possible for plugin writer to supply functions to help the SmartEiffel runtime implement a few of ANY's standard routines: standard_copy, deep_twin, standard_is_equal, deep_is_equal.
Optional vs. mandatory helpers
Putting helpers could be made mandatory or optional (if a reasonable default can be found).
Provide defaults where possible
A reasonable default is to assume that the external types are shallow, so the helpers for deep_twin and deep_is_equal can be made optional (but the plugin writer can provide them if he wants a special treatment)
Some backends may also be able to provide reasonable default helpers for standard_is_equal and standard_copy, making them optional. For other backends, the plugin-writer may have to provide one or both of the helpers. That may seem inconsistent but it's not really a problem as a plugin needs to be tested with every back-end it is supposed to work with anyway, so missing helpers will be detected. The C backend can generate a default copy function (using memcpy and sizeof), but it can't genereate a default equality testing function (the == operator can't be applied to structures, memcmp is unacceptable because two structures may differ only by garbage in the padding).
Don't provide defaults at all
Just throw an error if one of the helpers is missing.
Provide silly defaults, emit a warning
The default helpers just crash (with a run time stack if possible). Emit a warning if the plugin writer doesn't provide the required helpers.
Granularity
The granularity could be one pack of helpers per Eiffel class or one pack of helpers per external type (obvisouly there's no difference if the "external classes" implementation is chosen).
Eiffel class granularity
The helpers are eiffel functions with "magical" names.
External type granularity
The helper's names appear inside the "alias" clause.
Relevance to backends
Depending on the backend, the mechanism can add real expressivity or be of the "sugar" variety.
C
This is the only way to embed C structures into Eiffel objects. It also makes it easier to interact with C types that are typedef'd or #defined to a basic type that is not known in advance (up to now, plugin-writers had to guess if it would be e.g. an INTEGER_32 or an INTEGER_64).
Java
All the basic types are already wrapped and there are no typedefs or #defines. Finally, it is not possible to embed Java objects, so the gain would be limited. At least it means that we could rewrite the wrappers for the basic types using external types if we had the time (less magic is always a good thing!), and the we can embed more precise references to java objects than just "Object".